MANAGEMENT OF AI SMART MONITORING IN RAILWAY SYSTEMS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE, RISK-INFORMED DECISION SUPPORT, AND OPERATIONAL RESILIENCE
Affiliations
- 1Department of Management in Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Niš, Aleksandra Medvedeva 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia; milena.rajic@masfak.ni.ac.rs
- 2Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; iadamos@civil.auth.gr
- 3Department of Mechanical Constructions, Development, and Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Niš, Aleksandra Medvedeva 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia; milan.banic@masfak.ni.ac.rs
- 4Department of Mechanical Constructions, Development, and Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Niš, Aleksandra Medvedeva 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia; marko.peric@masfak.ni.ac.rs
- 5Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; balatsoukas.argyrios@gmail.com
Abstract
Artificial intelligence, data-driven condition monitoring and digital twins are increasingly used to anticipate railway degradation, yet their managerial value depends on whether predictions are converted into defensible maintenance actions. This paper provides a structured narrative review of recent peer-reviewed evidence on railway predictive maintenance, focusing on maintenance management rather than algorithmic performance alone. The synthesis examines condition assessment, failure anticipation, maintenance prioritization, scheduling and resource allocation, and closed-loop performance feedback across infrastructure and rolling-stock applications. Recent studies show that machine-learning models can identify high-risk track sections, provide explainable real-time fault warnings, and optimize tamping schedules under operational constraints. However, a persistent translation gap remains between accurate diagnosis and network-level management because of limited field validation, weak interoperability, uncertainty, black-box models, and fragmented system integration. A monitoring-to-management framework is therefore proposed, linking sensing, diagnosis, prognosis, criticality assessment, prioritization, scheduling, intervention and feedback, supported by explainability, data governance and lifecycle costing. The review positions AI monitoring as a decision-support capability embedded within railway asset-management processes.
Keywords
Cite this paper
Milena RAJIĆ, Giannis ADAMOS, Milan BANIĆ, Marko PERIĆ, Argyrios BALATSOUKAS. (2026). MANAGEMENT OF AI SMART MONITORING IN RAILWAY SYSTEMS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE, RISK-INFORMED DECISION SUPPORT, AND OPERATIONAL RESILIENCE. RAILCON ’26 — XXII International Scientific-Expert Conference on Railways, Niš, Serbia, pp. 143–146. https://doi.org/10.46793/railcon26.143R
Download BibTeX